IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ccasxx/v45y2026i2p278-286.html

Reputation as a weapon: digital violence against women activists in Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Karlygash Kabatova

Abstract

Across the globe, digital spaces have become both a tool for political mobilization and a battleground where activists face harassment, surveillance and disinformation. In this research note, I examine how digital violence is used to police, discredit and silence women activists in Kazakhstan. Drawing on my own experience as well as interviews and a small survey with activists in Kazakhstan, Belarus, Russia, Ukraine and Uzbekistan, I explore how women activists’ reputations become a central site of attack. I identify three recurring forms of digital violence: digital shaming and trolling, image-based abuse, and coordinated online smear campaigns. My central argument is that violence against women activists in Kazakhstan frequently operates through reputational attacks in digital spaces, targeting their perceived morality and respectability. These attacks ranging from sexualized defamation to dissemination of manipulated or intimate content, undermine women's credibility, delegitimize their activism and pressure them to withdraw from public life.

Suggested Citation

  • Karlygash Kabatova, 2026. "Reputation as a weapon: digital violence against women activists in Kazakhstan," Central Asian Survey, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 278-286, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:278-286
    DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2026.2649291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02634937.2026.2649291
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02634937.2026.2649291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:278-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ccas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.