IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ccasxx/v45y2026i2p269-277.html

We want to be heard: a victim empowerment approach to interviewing survivors of torture

Author

Listed:
  • Chamila Liyanage

Abstract

Researchers face significant ethical and sensitivity challenges when conducting interviews with survivors of torture, including the need to protect participants, minimize the distress of memory recollection, ensure justice for survivors, and safeguard the well-being of both survivors and researchers. While studies of victimized communities such as Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) are growing, there is little reflective discussion on how researchers navigate these ethical complexities. Building on Stanley’s (2012) critical approach to studying torture and drawing on my experience of interviewing an exiled Uyghur torture survivor and a Falun Gong torture survivor, in this research note, I offer first-hand insights into the challenges of interviewing survivors. I propose a victim empowerment approach, which consists of three interlinked strategies: creating an environment that reduces potential distress during memory recollection, adopting a storytelling-centred interview style, and amplifying survivors’ voices rather than anonymizing or silencing them.

Suggested Citation

  • Chamila Liyanage, 2026. "We want to be heard: a victim empowerment approach to interviewing survivors of torture," Central Asian Survey, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 269-277, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:269-277
    DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2026.2638299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02634937.2026.2638299
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02634937.2026.2638299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:45:y:2026:i:2:p:269-277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ccas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.