IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v68y2026i3p613-635.html

Freedom of contract and company freedom. Corporate governance in Norway, 1890–1930

Author

Listed:
  • Knut Sogner
  • Victoria Ciobanu Austveg

Abstract

Using a comparative framework emphasising Germany and the USA, this article argues the first Norwegian Corporate Act of 1910 clarified the corporation’s legal independence from its shareholders by introducing the organ principle adapted from German law. From 1910, the corporation was not run on a mandate from the shareholders and the General Assembly, but under the leadership of the Board of Directors. The board acted as the corporation (the organ principle). This somewhat continued Norway’s freedom of contract past, although the organ principle replaced previous internal contracts with power sharing across the corporation’s organs. The corporate entity, to be liable and responsible as well as primed for growth and development, became an individual actor distinct from its shareholders. The article explores the comparative implications this had for corporate governance in Norway, Germany and the USA and argues labour inclusion, managerial autonomy and preparedness for social responsibility were important consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Knut Sogner & Victoria Ciobanu Austveg, 2026. "Freedom of contract and company freedom. Corporate governance in Norway, 1890–1930," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(3), pages 613-635, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:68:y:2026:i:3:p:613-635
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2025.2512872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2025.2512872
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2025.2512872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:68:y:2026:i:3:p:613-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.