IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v68y2026i2p490-508.html

Kicking away the ladder? Trade, technology transfer, and Chinese-East German disputes on the development of precision mechanics and optical industry

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Chen

Abstract

The German Democratic Republic (GDR), an industrial socialist nation known for its optical industry, particularly VEB Carl Zeiss Jena, was China’s primary supplier of optical lenses and equipment during the Cold War. Economic and technological negotiations between China and the GDR frequently centred on the optical industry. While China aimed to advance its optical sector, the GDR sought to maintain the status quo and boost exports by proposing a division of labour—reminiscent of pre-socialist imperialist and capitalist policies. However, China’s communist leaders rejected this approach, insisting on building a self-­sufficient industrial system. Despite criticism that the GDR’s policy aimed to limit China’s development, optical exports to China remained strong through the late 1960s. Mao’s rejection of the GDR’s proposal and resistance to production cooperation ultimately hindered China’s optical industry growth and strained economic cooperation within the socialist bloc during this period.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Chen, 2026. "Kicking away the ladder? Trade, technology transfer, and Chinese-East German disputes on the development of precision mechanics and optical industry," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(2), pages 490-508, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:68:y:2026:i:2:p:490-508
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2025.2512873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2025.2512873
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2025.2512873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:68:y:2026:i:2:p:490-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.