IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v67y2025i5p1294-1314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An antitrust case in the diamond industry: The United States v. the De Beers cartel (1948)

Author

Listed:
  • Véronique Pouillard

Abstract

This paper examines an antitrust case filed in 1945 by the United States Department of Justice against the diamond cartel led by the South African firm De Beers. By the end of the interwar period, the Belgian Congo firms in the cartel were the largest producers of industrial diamonds in the world. Demand for this product had stagnated during the interwar period but increased during World War II, as industrial diamonds were needed by the arms industry. This resulted in a partial shift of De Beers’ production away from jewellery diamonds to support the allied war effort. This article focuses on the background of the case and engages with reasons why the Department of Justice filed the complaint. It examines the De Beers production historically, before investigating the lawsuit’s arguments. The strategic importance of the US diamond stockpile was the central issue. The paper considers the historiography of the diamond industry and discusses historians’ hypotheses regarding the case. Although dismissed in 1948, the case resulted in changes in the cartel’s organisation and in greater scrutiny of De Beers’ activities. The case marks a turning point for the cartel, which then entered an adaptation phase that ensured its survival until nearly the end of the century.

Suggested Citation

  • Véronique Pouillard, 2025. "An antitrust case in the diamond industry: The United States v. the De Beers cartel (1948)," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(5), pages 1294-1314, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:5:p:1294-1314
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2024.2340621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2024.2340621
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2024.2340621?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:5:p:1294-1314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.