IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v67y2025i4p1141-1164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Storm in a teacup: Empire products, blended teas, and origin marking debates in 1920s Britain

Author

Listed:
  • David M. Higgins
  • Aashish Velkar

Abstract

This article uses the origin marking of tea as a case study to examine contemporary debates on imperial preference and ‘soft’ trade protection. The case integrates three themes affecting the UK business environment during the 1920s: protectionism, imperial tariff preference, and consumer choice. We discuss the extent to which consumers’ tea purchases were influenced by proprietary brand, or geographical origin. Our analysis focuses on the legislative framework provided by the Merchandise Marks Act, 1926, mandating origin marking for specific imported foodstuffs. Contrary to the established view, we demonstrate how product quality in the supply chain of tea consumed in the UK was determined not by the producers (tea growers), but by the major UK-based blenders. We argue that UK consumers were unable to exercise any meaningful voluntary preference for empire teas. Our article reveals that the political idea of an ‘empire product’ did not always translate well into commercial reality.

Suggested Citation

  • David M. Higgins & Aashish Velkar, 2025. "Storm in a teacup: Empire products, blended teas, and origin marking debates in 1920s Britain," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(4), pages 1141-1164, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:4:p:1141-1164
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2024.2313519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2024.2313519
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2024.2313519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:4:p:1141-1164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.