IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v67y2025i3p738-757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Country-of-origin and competitive market dynamics: Italian biscuits and German cutlery, 1870–1920

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Pirani
  • Christina Lubinski

Abstract

Business historians have for long described the marketing value of country-of-origin (COO), often foregrounding the advantages of goods from a particular region. We argue that to fully understand COO, we also need to explore the impact of market competition on its evolution. This study compares two examples: the market category of Italian biscotti and the use of Made in Germany in the cutlery export business with India (1870–1920). In both, the perceptions of COO evolved as an advantage derived from competitive market dynamics, showing different ways of how competition mattered for COO. While Italian biscotti emerged out of imitation of British first movers, the value of cutlery Made in Germany was realised through a process of distinction from British competitors. Hence, we criticise approaches that isolate COO from its competitive environment or naturalise its advantages as timeless and absolute. Instead, we suggest a research agenda that pays attention to the way COO narratives incorporate comparative perspectives and commercial rivalry.Video AbstractRead the transcriptWatch the video on Vimeo

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Pirani & Christina Lubinski, 2025. "Country-of-origin and competitive market dynamics: Italian biscuits and German cutlery, 1870–1920," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(3), pages 738-757, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:3:p:738-757
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2023.2276776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2023.2276776
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2023.2276776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:3:p:738-757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.