IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v67y2025i2p496-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

State-owned enterprises after the market turn: Hybridisation and the historical development of nested paradoxes in the case of Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Ola Innset

Abstract

The article studies the recent history of state owned enterprises (SOEs) in Norway through the lens of paradox theory. A tension between business goals and political goals lie at the heart of SOEs, and I analyse processes of partial privatisations in the 1990s and early 2000s as attempts to overcome this original paradox. Through the public listing of major SOEs, the Norwegian state became the largest owner on the Oslo stock exchange and a new corporate governance setup for these entities arose. I propose to see this development as a case of historically developed nested paradoxes, and argue that a new paradox emerged in which the Norwegian state attempted to reach political goals through the ownership of SOEs by not having explicit political goals. I find two main equilibrating mechanisms for this paradox, and discuss some of the ways paradoxical tensions of SOEs still persist despite attempts to overcome them.

Suggested Citation

  • Ola Innset, 2025. "State-owned enterprises after the market turn: Hybridisation and the historical development of nested paradoxes in the case of Norway," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(2), pages 496-520, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:2:p:496-520
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2024.2353661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2024.2353661
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2024.2353661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:67:y:2025:i:2:p:496-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.