IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bindes/v61y2025i2p261-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nudging Taxpayers via Instant Messaging to Submit Their Annual Tax Return: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Rio Widianto
  • Matthias Rieger
  • Mansoob Murshed
  • Vid Adrison

Abstract

This paper tests nudges delivered via WhatsApp to encourage timely annual tax returns among 24,887 individual non-employee taxpayers in six tax offices in Indonesia. We compared a standard email to three treatments delivered via a verified WhatsApp business account: (1) a standard message, (2) a deterrence message and (3) a reciprocity message. The pre-registered design permitted separating the effects of the mode of delivery (WhatsApp versus email) and behavioural messaging. Of the control group, 37.7% submitted their annual tax return on time. Based on WhatsApp status reports, we found that 44.2% of treated taxpayers received and read the messages. The standard reminder via WhatsApp increased tax return rates by 3.3 percentage points. The reciprocity message did not yield further improvement. Instead, we found that the deterrence message increased compliance by an additional 1.9 percentage points. Heterogeneity and sensitivity to deviations from the pre-registered design, including implementation, was investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Rio Widianto & Matthias Rieger & Mansoob Murshed & Vid Adrison, 2025. "Nudging Taxpayers via Instant Messaging to Submit Their Annual Tax Return: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 261-285, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:bindes:v:61:y:2025:i:2:p:261-285
    DOI: 10.1080/00074918.2024.2437824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00074918.2024.2437824
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00074918.2024.2437824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bindes:v:61:y:2025:i:2:p:261-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CBIE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.