IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i5p959-972.html

Would workers value a few more hours of work? Technological progress and time-related underemployment among Chinese workers

Author

Listed:
  • Kangsi Zhang
  • Xuenan Qiu
  • Chen Zhu

Abstract

The manifestation of insufficient labour demand has shifted from unemployment to underemployment. However, few studies have examined the impact of robotic technology on underemployment, particularly in terms of working hours rather than the unemployment rate. To address this gap, this paper first refines the calculation method proposed by Acemoglu and Restrepo (2019b) and remeasures the level of robot adoption across cities in China. The empirical relationship between robotic technology and underemployment is examined by matching this data with individual-level data from the China Labor Dynamics Survey. The study finds that robotic technology can effectively alleviate time-related underemployment, with a more pronounced effect in national innovation pilot cities. Mechanism analysis reveals that robotic technology enhances labour market opportunities by stimulating secondary innovations and attracting new firms while improving job matching quality by guiding workers in their job search and transitions, thereby alleviating underemployment. The study suggests that leveraging fiscal policy to support the growth of new enterprises or R&D innovations, eliminating barriers to labour mobility, and improving lifelong vocational training systems can help unlock the technological dividend and achieve high-quality full employment sooner.

Suggested Citation

  • Kangsi Zhang & Xuenan Qiu & Chen Zhu, 2026. "Would workers value a few more hours of work? Technological progress and time-related underemployment among Chinese workers," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 959-972, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:5:p:959-972
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2461329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2461329
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2461329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:5:p:959-972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.