IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i3p540-557.html

Systemic risk under different clearing methods for multiple derivatives

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Tang
  • Hong Fan

Abstract

The superposition of credit and interest rate derivatives brings liquidity and benefits to financial markets but may shock the system. Various clearing methods, including bilateral and CCP clearing, have emerged since the proposal of a mandatory clearing system. Previous research has focused on single derivatives, neglecting multiple derivatives. Thus, this paper constructs a banking network model incorporating two derivatives and investigates the banking systemic risk under two clearing methods: joint clearing in the same CCP and separate clearing in different CCPs. Results show that the systemic risk of joint clearing in the same CCP is lower than that of separate clearing in different CCPs. Increasing the central clearing ratio increases the systemic risk under separate clearing in different CCPs. The systemic risk is low when the central clearing ratios for credit derivatives and interest rate derivatives are similar under joint clearing in the same CCP approach. In addition, the systemic risk can be significantly underestimated by studying only one type of derivatives in the banking network. This paper not only provides theoretical support for the banking systemic risk under multiple derivatives clearing issues, but also offers strategic suggestions for regulators to clear derivatives reasonably and effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Tang & Hong Fan, 2026. "Systemic risk under different clearing methods for multiple derivatives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 540-557, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:3:p:540-557
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2453762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2453762
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2453762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:3:p:540-557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.