IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i36p7587-7601.html

Empirical analysis of monetization and sovereign default: a logit and random forest analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Masaki Fukui
  • Shogo Yoshida
  • Keigo Kameda

Abstract

There is a prevailing claim, particularly among proponents of modern monetary theory (MMT), which sovereign defaults on public debt denominated in a sovereign currency can be avoided through monetization. Despite considerable opposition to this assertion, to the best of the authors‘ knowledge, no rigorous empirical analysis has been conducted to test this proposition. This study aims to fill this gap by statistically analysing the validity of the proposition using traditional logistic regression and a machine-learning technique known as random forest. The findings suggest that, although the share of public debt denominated in a sovereign currency indeed reduces the probability of sovereign default, other factors, such as the public debt-to-gross domestic product ratio and the economic growth rate, do significantly influence the probability of sovereign default. These results indicate that the data do not support the MMT’s assertion.

Suggested Citation

  • Masaki Fukui & Shogo Yoshida & Keigo Kameda, 2026. "Empirical analysis of monetization and sovereign default: a logit and random forest analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(36), pages 7587-7601, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:36:p:7587-7601
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2535543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2535543
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2535543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:36:p:7587-7601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.