IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i35p7216-7233.html

The gender gaps in informal loan markets

Author

Listed:
  • Wisarut Suwanprasert

Abstract

This paper estimates gender gaps in accessing and using informal loans, along with the prevalence of unethical practices associated with these loans, using unique individual-level survey data from Thailand. The analysis provides three main findings. First, there is no significant overall gender gap in the likelihood of obtaining informal loans, but gender gaps emerge across occupations, with gaps of 6.1 and −4.0 percentage points for private-sector employees and the self-employed, respectively. Women borrow approximately 20 percent less than men and pay interest rates that are 5.4 percentage points higher. Second, women are 5.9 percentage points more likely to use informal loans for business investments and 5.0 percentage points less likely to use them for necessary expenses. Third, women are more inclined to borrow from in-area private lenders and loan sharks, facing a likelihood of physical threats that is 3.4 percentage points higher, but a likelihood of predatory contracts that is 1.5 percentage points lower. These findings highlight the need for greater financial inclusion and address the social challenges of violence within Thailand’s informal loan markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Wisarut Suwanprasert, 2026. "The gender gaps in informal loan markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(35), pages 7216-7233, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:35:p:7216-7233
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2532188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2532188
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2532188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:35:p:7216-7233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.