IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i33p6787-6803.html

How firms’ perception of energy uncertainty affects ESG performance: evidence from Chinese energy-intensive industry

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyu Zhu
  • Lisha Zhang
  • Xize Liu
  • Xiangwei Xie

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of firms’ perception of energy uncertainty (PEU) on their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, employing a novel firm-level PEU index. Based on a panel of Chinese energy-intensive firms from 2015 to 2023, we find that elevated PEU significantly undermines ESG performance, particularly in environmental and social dimensions. Further analysis shows that financial constraints amplify the negative impact of PEU on ESG performance, whereas media coverage mitigates this negative relationship. The heterogeneity analysis further demonstrates that the negative influence of PEU on ESG performance is especially pronounced among traditional energy firms. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and corporate managers, highlighting the importance of financial support and media engagement in mitigating the risks posed by energy uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyu Zhu & Lisha Zhang & Xize Liu & Xiangwei Xie, 2026. "How firms’ perception of energy uncertainty affects ESG performance: evidence from Chinese energy-intensive industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(33), pages 6787-6803, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:33:p:6787-6803
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2526179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2526179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2526179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:33:p:6787-6803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.