IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i33p6753-6769.html

A dynamic asset allocation approach under technical analysis and machine learning classification

Author

Listed:
  • Gia Buu Luc
  • Chih-Chiang Wu

Abstract

This research evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning models by comparing the performance of seven models in predicting the return movement of four asset types over different return periods. The assets include S&P 500 Futures, Gold Futures, US 10Y Treasury Bond Futures, and a risk-free investment. The study considers 1-week, 4-week, and 12-week forward return periods. The analysis assesses model accuracy and portfolio performance using data spanning two decades. ML-based portfolios modestly outperform an equal-weighted benchmark in terms of risk-adjusted metrics over longer horizons, even though the differences are generally insignificant. However, the study emphasizes the importance of considering diverse economic cycles to understand asset behaviour comprehensively. Nevertheless, the study did not find significant evidence that combining machine learning prediction with dynamic asset allocation can outperform passive portfolio investment. The study underscores the potential of non-linear models in short-term trading but also notes limitations in adaptiveness, threshold design, and model generalization under atypical conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gia Buu Luc & Chih-Chiang Wu, 2026. "A dynamic asset allocation approach under technical analysis and machine learning classification," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(33), pages 6753-6769, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:33:p:6753-6769
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2526177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2526177
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2526177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:33:p:6753-6769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.