IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i32p6575-6589.html

Exuberant investors and oil market dynamics from 1859 to 1913: implications for the current big tech antitrust

Author

Listed:
  • Haiwei Chen
  • James F. Arkell

Abstract

This study analyses the oil market dynamics during the period of 1859–1913 to shed light on the current antitrust debate involving the largest tech firms in the platform economy. It is found that changes in the number of new oil wells and producing wells are not Granger caused by changes in interest rates and crude prices, respectively. There is no contemporaneous relation between interest rates and the number of new wells or between crude prices and the number of producing wells, indicating that exuberant investors are not deterred by adverse movements in the cost of capital. It is found that price margin between gasoline and crude oil is higher during the trust period than during the non-trust period. These findings show a historical precedent in price decreases and highlight the potential pitfall in assessing consumer welfare solely through the lens of product prices in antitrust enforcement. Similar to those who funded the oil rush in the nineteenth century, today’s exuberant investors are funding the expansion of tech firms providing free services. A new regulatory regime with a reasonable return to the traditional doctrine of the rule of reason may help deter the excessive exuberant investors in today’s platform economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiwei Chen & James F. Arkell, 2026. "Exuberant investors and oil market dynamics from 1859 to 1913: implications for the current big tech antitrust," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(32), pages 6575-6589, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:32:p:6575-6589
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2522380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2522380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2522380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:32:p:6575-6589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.