IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i21p4151-4168.html

Trade openness and individual happiness: who benefits the most?

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Liu
  • Jingxian Li
  • Ruina Bai
  • Xiao Yu

Abstract

Using data from the World Values Survey and European Values Survey from 1999 to 2021, covering 102 countries, this study examined how trade openness affects individual happiness and through what channels. The findings revealed that trade openness generally had a positive impact on individuals’ happiness, particularly through exports and goods trade, which significantly enhanced residents’ happiness in low- and middle-income countries (regions). This positive effect was primarily achieved through the economic growth generated by trade openness. These findings challenge the applicability of the Easterlin paradox and provide empirical support for the Stolper – Samuelson theorem. Additionally, trade openness exhibited a ‘cross-age’ effect on happiness, and its welfare benefits remained robust despite uncertainty shocks. Economic growth amplified the positive effect of trade openness, whereas inflation and unemployment weakened it. These findings suggest that policymakers in low- and middle-income countries should prioritize trade openness as a tool to improve residents’ happiness; however, countries facing high inflation, unemployment, and income inequality should proceed cautiously with trade openness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Liu & Jingxian Li & Ruina Bai & Xiao Yu, 2026. "Trade openness and individual happiness: who benefits the most?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(21), pages 4151-4168, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:21:p:4151-4168
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2492897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2492897
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2492897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:21:p:4151-4168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.