IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i1p141-156.html

Does energy poverty affect subjective well-being? Evidence from a cross-country analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yiwen Li
  • Wenwen Zhang
  • Bin Zhao
  • Basil Sharp
  • Jianyun Nie

Abstract

Although energy poverty has been confirmed to degrade the environment and cause health issues, studies have seldom focused on the relationship between energy poverty and subjective well-being (SWB) at a global level. Therefore, we investigate the effects of energy poverty on SWB using a quantile regression model and a panel autoregressive distributed lag model based on panel data of 56 countries from 2005 to 2019. The results indicate that the magnitude of energy poverty significantly vary across countries with different income levels. Lower middle-income countries have the highest levels of energy poverty, while high-income countries have the lowest levels. Energy poverty reduces SWB across all income groups, but lower middle-income countries are more affected than high-income countries. Specifically, the impact of energy poverty on the SWB of lower middle-income countries is approximately 2.8 times that of high-income countries. Additionally, the long-term impact of energy poverty on SWB is greater than its short-term impact. Therefore, efforts to address global energy poverty are urgently required. Importantly, countries that address energy poverty in a targeted manner align with their national conditions and characteristics, while leveraging their own advantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiwen Li & Wenwen Zhang & Bin Zhao & Basil Sharp & Jianyun Nie, 2026. "Does energy poverty affect subjective well-being? Evidence from a cross-country analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 141-156, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:1:p:141-156
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2449208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2449208
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2449208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:1:p:141-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.