IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v58y2026i13p2533-2547.html

The impact of intergenerational educational mobility on fertility intentions: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Yang
  • Zebing Yang

Abstract

Existing studies mostly examine how individuals’ experiences of intergenerational mobility influence their fertility intentions, while research on the effects of regional intergenerational mobility remains limited. This article investigates the impact of regional intergenerational educational mobility (IGM) on fertility intentions using data from the China Family Panel Studies survey (CFPS). The findings indicate a significant positive relationship between IGM and fertility intentions. One of the critical mechanisms might be alleviating parenting cost pressure. This effect is primarily driven by a reduction in parental anxiety and status-seeking behaviours from higher IGM, which decreases household educational expenditures, easing the ‘quality-quantity’ trade-off in fertility decisions. Besides, the impact of IGM is more pronounced among highly educated individuals, men, and the agricultural population. These results highlight the crucial role of educational equity in shaping fertility preferences. By shifting the focus from individual mobility experiences to the openness of social structures, this study enriches the understanding of low fertility intentions. Current fertility promotion policies in China should also consider the fairness of educational opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Yang & Zebing Yang, 2026. "The impact of intergenerational educational mobility on fertility intentions: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(13), pages 2533-2547, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:13:p:2533-2547
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2025.2479158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2025.2479158
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2025.2479158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:58:y:2026:i:13:p:2533-2547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.