IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i59p10771-10787.html

Does the national ecological civilization pilot zone achieve a “win-win” circumstance for the environment and the economy: empirical evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Zhang
  • Chang’an Wang
  • Xiaoqian Liu
  • Xingmin Zhang
  • Abd Alwahed Dagestani

Abstract

Faced with increasing constraints on resource supply, serious environmental pollution, as well as degraded ecosystems, humans urgently need to propose effective environmental governance initiatives and construct an environmental governance system. Exploiting the national ecological civilization pilot zone (NECPZ) policy as a quasi-natural experiment and using city-level data from 2011 to 2019, this research employs a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to evaluate the comprehensive environmental and economic effects of the NECPZ policy. Meanwhile, we investigate its mechanisms using firm-level data from 2011 to 2019. The NECPZ policy significantly reduces city carbon emission intensity and promotes industrial structure upgrading. The results still hold after a series of robustness tests. The mechanism analysis indicates that NECPZ policy curbs urban carbon emission intensity and boosts industrial structure upgrading via altering four firm behaviours: corporate environmental management, green technological innovation, green finance, and tax relief. Moreover, the impact of NECPZ policy on city carbon emission intensity and industrial structure upgrading varies considerably among regions and different city types. Combining empirical findings and theoretical analysis, this paper argues that NECPZ achieves a ‘win-win’ situation of ecological protection and economic development, which provides evidence for other developing countries to govern the environment and simultaneously develop their economies through constructing ecological civilization systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Zhang & Chang’an Wang & Xiaoqian Liu & Xingmin Zhang & Abd Alwahed Dagestani, 2025. "Does the national ecological civilization pilot zone achieve a “win-win” circumstance for the environment and the economy: empirical evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(59), pages 10771-10787, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:59:p:10771-10787
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2445323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2445323
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2445323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:59:p:10771-10787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.