IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i59p10504-10519.html

A leverage-based explanation of the ESG premium: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Daye Li
  • Qiankun Sun
  • Xiaofang Li

Abstract

Investing according to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria has received widespread attention globally, but empirical research on whether ESG investing can generate excess returns has yielded inconsistent results. Our study attempts to reconcile the conflicting results of research on the ESG premium and provides guidance for ESG investors. Using ESG score data from Chinese A-share listed companies, our research reveals a positive correlation between expected returns and ESG scores in highly leveraged firms, but a negative association in low-leverage firms. This premium cannot be explained by common risk factors and is robust to controlling for common financial indicators. We argue that this phenomenon is related to green finance policies and financial leverage. These policies have mitigated the externalities associated with ESG-related risks. However, the impact of low-interest loan policies on companies is heterogeneous, with high-leverage companies deriving greater advantage, possibly because, for highly leveraged non-financial firms, financing costs account for a larger proportion of total costs, making the reduction in loan interest rates more significant in affecting the company’s overall expenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Daye Li & Qiankun Sun & Xiaofang Li, 2025. "A leverage-based explanation of the ESG premium: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(59), pages 10504-10519, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:59:p:10504-10519
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2432648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2432648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2432648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:59:p:10504-10519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.