IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i58p9950-9963.html

Moral hazard in physician prescribing behavior: evidence from China’s Zero-Markup Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Zhang
  • Yuxi Dong
  • Yang Li
  • Miao Guo

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the moral hazard associated with physician prescription patterns in the context of China’s Zero-Markup Policy (ZMP), which annuls markups on Western medications while exempting Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Using a distinctive dataset of administrative records, we investigate the influence of patient insurance status on the consumption of drugs, with a discerning focus on the disparate utilization of Western drugs and TCM. Our empirical results reveal a pattern in which insured patients exhibit increased expenditure on TCM and decreased outlay on Western drugs relative to their uninsured counterparts, suggesting that physicians are incentivized to prescribe profit-generating TCM rather than Western drugs with zero markup. A heterogeneity analysis confirms the consistency of these findings across varied health insurance schemes and a pronounced tendency among patients aged over 30. Our findings illuminate the dynamics of provider-induced demand in the pharmaceutical sector under China’s ZMP, contributing to the discourse on policy-induced perverse incentives in healthcare provisioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Zhang & Yuxi Dong & Yang Li & Miao Guo, 2025. "Moral hazard in physician prescribing behavior: evidence from China’s Zero-Markup Policy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(58), pages 9950-9963, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:58:p:9950-9963
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2424502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2424502
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2424502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:58:p:9950-9963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.