IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i57p9788-9806.html

The asymmetric and dynamic effects of oil price shocks and geopolitical risks on carbon prices in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Huang
  • Hao Wu
  • Xia Chen

Abstract

This paper investigates the asymmetric and dynamic effects of oil price shocks and geopolitical risks (GPR) on carbon prices in China. We address this issue using a quantile framework, incorporating the quantile autoregressive distributed lag (QARDL) approach, rolling window QARDL and the quantile Granger causality test. Empirical findings indicate that in the long term, oil risk and supply shocks positively impact carbon prices in bullish markets, while oil demand shocks affect normal and bearish markets. GPR significantly drives carbon prices across all quantiles, except the 0.8 quantile, with the strongest effect observed in extremely bullish markets. In the short term, oil shocks and GPR have a similar but stronger influence. Additionally, both the short- and long-term effects of oil price shocks and GPR vary over time. The ‘camel-hump’ shape of the causality further validates the asymmetric causal effects of oil price shocks and GPR on carbon prices. These findings provide valuable insights for portfolio managers and policymakers, emphasizing the importance of adopting a quantile-based approach to risk management, rather than focusing solely on average effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Huang & Hao Wu & Xia Chen, 2025. "The asymmetric and dynamic effects of oil price shocks and geopolitical risks on carbon prices in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(57), pages 9788-9806, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:57:p:9788-9806
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2423900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2423900
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2423900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:57:p:9788-9806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.