IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i54p9185-9202.html

Analyst recommendations, acquirer’s valuation, and M&A performance: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yugang Chen
  • Jihua Lu
  • Yasir Shahab

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of premerger analyst recommendations on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) announcement returns. We find that M&A announcement returns decrease with premerger analysts’ favourable recommendations (PAFR). Furthermore, we find that increasing acquirers’ valuations in the preannouncement period is a possible channel that allows PAFR to reduce M&A announcement returns. We explore three alternative explanations including, ‘analyst information role’, ‘analyst pressure’ and ‘informed trading’ explanations for our main nexus, and our findings are still robust. In an additional analysis, we find that this negative relationship is more pronounced among acquirers with (a) high information uncertainty (b), low media criticism, and (c) high investor attention. Moreover, we identify three sources of conflicts of interest in analyst recommendations: M&A relations, controlling shareholder share pledging, and stock ownership composition. Our research enriches the impact of analysts’ recommendations on M&A outcomes and provides new empirical evidence of analysts’ strengthening of overvaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yugang Chen & Jihua Lu & Yasir Shahab, 2025. "Analyst recommendations, acquirer’s valuation, and M&A performance: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(54), pages 9185-9202, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:54:p:9185-9202
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2409844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2409844
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2409844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:54:p:9185-9202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.