IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i54p9070-9083.html

Does agricultural knowledge technical training promote adoption of sustainable agricultural practices?

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Yu
  • Williams Ali
  • Zhiju Xie

Abstract

The promotion and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices is an important issue in China’s agricultural development policy, particularly because it offers a path to protecting land and water resources to ensure food security. Despite tremendous efforts in encouraging farmers to adopt sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs), adoption has remained low. The lack of relevant information on the use and benefits of these SAPs has been recognized as a major constraint limiting their adoption. Agricultural knowledge and technology training (AKT) could be leveraged to bridge this gap to increase their adoption. Given the paucity of evidence, this study investigates the impact of participation in AKT on SAPs using data on a sample of farmers from Sichuan province of China. We apply the Endogenous-treatment Poisson regression to account for sample selection bias. The empirical results reveal that AKT improved the adoption intensity of SAPs by 74.6%, indicating that policy makers and related stakeholders should provide more agricultural schooling and training to improve farmers’ human capital endowment. These findings have implication on the provision of support for the development of rural policies to promote internet access and basic infrastructure to accelerate the adoption of these multiple sustainable practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Yu & Williams Ali & Zhiju Xie, 2025. "Does agricultural knowledge technical training promote adoption of sustainable agricultural practices?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(54), pages 9070-9083, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:54:p:9070-9083
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2406523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2406523
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2406523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:54:p:9070-9083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.