IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i50p8267-8290.html

Credit allocation and public credit guarantee schemes for small businesses: evidence from Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Daisuke Tsuruta

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between the use of a public credit guarantee scheme for small businesses and the efficiency of credit allocation using region- and industry-level data from Japan for the period from 1968 to 2005. Because credit constraints are more severe for small businesses than for large firms, a public credit guarantee scheme that mitigates this constraint on small firms’ growth could enhance social welfare. If credit-guaranteed loans are allocated to firms with high value added, a public credit guarantee scheme would enhance the efficiency of credit allocation. Conversely, however, public credit guarantee schemes can squeeze credit allocations for small businesses. When financial institutions offer loans through credit guarantee schemes, the incentives of the financial institutions to monitor the activity of small business borrowers may decline. In addition, because Japan’s public credit guarantee scheme is a component of a broader set of social policies aiming to eliminate inequality, credit-guaranteed loans can be offered to economically distressed firms. In this situation, we identify a negative relationship between the amount of credit guaranteed and value added. We show that Japan’s public credit guarantee schemes reduced the efficiency of credit allocations, with negative implications for industry and regional growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Daisuke Tsuruta, 2025. "Credit allocation and public credit guarantee schemes for small businesses: evidence from Japan," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(50), pages 8267-8290, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:50:p:8267-8290
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2399165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2399165
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2399165?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:50:p:8267-8290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.