IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i49p8210-8225.html

Fintech model performance analysis in credit loans: evidence from China city commercial banks

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Xing
  • Tieming Li
  • Liangming Cheng
  • Feiyun Sha

Abstract

The analysis of bank loan performance has consistently been a central issue in banking research. With the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed a significant increase in online loans. Our study employs fintech models to develop a big data credit analysis system, evaluating model efficiency and the effect of ‘data organization’ on predictive performance for city commercial bank loans. Our results show that training data size, timeliness, and inter-bank ‘data sharing’ significantly affect model predictions. We also find that traditional econometric models (Logit and Probit) have the weakest predictive ability. However, ‘most advanced’ deep learning models perform worse than machine learning models with lower algorithmic complexity, such as Random Forest. Besides, ‘sharing training data’ generally increases model efficiency, but there are exceptions for larger city commercial banks. This paper provides ample empirical evidence for the application of the fintech model in bank loan credit. It highlights several characteristics of training data, such as size and timeliness, which greatly affect model efficiencies. We also provide policy recommendations for fintech transition and collaboration among municipal banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Xing & Tieming Li & Liangming Cheng & Feiyun Sha, 2025. "Fintech model performance analysis in credit loans: evidence from China city commercial banks," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(49), pages 8210-8225, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:49:p:8210-8225
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2397145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2397145
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2397145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:49:p:8210-8225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.