IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i49p8066-8085.html

Compliance measurement and labour regulation enforcement: a randomized field experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Rolando Campusano
  • Francisca Pérez
  • Rodrigo Wagner

Abstract

Labour regulation matters for the economy. But measuring firms’ compliance with this regulation poses significant challenges as inspections, enforcement, or reporting might be correlated to compliance risk factors of each firm. We propose estimating the compliance rate by a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of standard labour inspections. We run the experiment on small and medium firms (SME) in Chile. We estimate a non-compliance sanction rate of 13%. Our results are robust to various alternative estimation methods. Additional results look at the effects of enforcing labour laws, showing no significant differences on firms’ growth; neither on the intensive (employment and sales) nor the extensive margin (exit). Nonetheless, the experiment had limited power for these additional results. Our methods and results matter for the monitoring and enforcement of labour policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rolando Campusano & Francisca Pérez & Rodrigo Wagner, 2025. "Compliance measurement and labour regulation enforcement: a randomized field experiment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(49), pages 8066-8085, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:49:p:8066-8085
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2394703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2394703
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2394703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:49:p:8066-8085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.