IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i48p7873-7888.html

Mobile banking apps and the informal economy: evidence from survey data in Indonesia and Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Shawn Hunter
  • Andreas Chai
  • Peter Morgan
  • Ho Fai Chan
  • Benno Torgler
  • Nicholas Rohde

Abstract

Reducing preference for cash and supporting the adoption of digital financial services can help achieve financial inclusion while also diminishing economic informality. However, previous evidence suggests that increased access to formal banking services has not resulted in an immediate reduction in usage of informal services. This paper estimates the effects of mobile phone banking apps on the demand for cash using unique survey data from Bangladesh and Indonesia. Our models indicate that having access to a banking or payment app reduces a variable capturing preference for cash by between 4% and 10%. The results are robust to a range of specification checks (including the inclusion/omission of various controls) which suggests that confounding from unobservables is unlikely to be a substantive source of bias. Since cash is the preferred payment mechanism for the poor in developing countries, the results suggest that access to digital banking apps may reduce informality within the finance sector, leading to broader development implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Shawn Hunter & Andreas Chai & Peter Morgan & Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler & Nicholas Rohde, 2025. "Mobile banking apps and the informal economy: evidence from survey data in Indonesia and Bangladesh," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(48), pages 7873-7888, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:48:p:7873-7888
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2393900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2393900
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2393900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:48:p:7873-7888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.