IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i47p7657-7670.html

Performance comparison of alternative volatility models applied to economic indexes: the role of asymmetric effects

Author

Listed:
  • Mário Correia Fernandes
  • Tiago Mota Dutra
  • João C.A. Teixeira
  • Inês Silvestre

Abstract

This article examines the empirical relationship between economic indexes – namely the industrial production and the consumer confidence – and their volatility by using the United States data over the periods 1919–2023 and 1960–2023, respectively. To address this topic, several GARCH-family models including volatility feedback and the asymmetric effects are estimated. We find that (i) the industrial production index exhibits asymmetric effects, with significant fitting performance over the standard GARCH model; (ii) the inclusion of $t$t-distributed innovations in the error term improves the fitting performance of the competing models against their counterparts with a normal distribution assumption; (iii) both models tested for the consumer confidence index exhibit similar performance to fit with the data; (iv) by excluding the months during and after the COVID-19 pandemics and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, it leads to the same results and conclusions for both economic indexes. Conditional heteroscedasticity, economic growth, GARCH models, asymmetric effects, volatility feedback

Suggested Citation

  • Mário Correia Fernandes & Tiago Mota Dutra & João C.A. Teixeira & Inês Silvestre, 2025. "Performance comparison of alternative volatility models applied to economic indexes: the role of asymmetric effects," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(47), pages 7657-7670, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:47:p:7657-7670
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2393460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2393460
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2393460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:47:p:7657-7670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.