IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i47p7627-7642.html

The return of university reputation in job applications: evidence from a field experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinghao Li
  • Jian Zhou
  • Yang Cai

Abstract

It is crucial to understand the impact of education on labour market outcomes. Although previous literature has extensively documented the effect of university reputation on employees’ earnings, it lacks knowledge regarding the hiring process. This study aims to contribute to the existing literature by examining whether job applicants from reputable universities are more likely to receive interview invitations in China. To investigate this causal relationship, we conducted a field experiment by randomly generating and delivering fictitious resumes to employers. The results demonstrated that applicants graduating from reputable universities were more likely to obtain interview invitations, suggesting that the university reputation exerts a positive effect on the hiring process. We showed that these results were unlikely driven by model specifications, control variables or alternative explanations. Additionally, we examined the effect of the reputation of specialized majors and discovered that their influence is considerably less than that of university reputation. This study improves our understanding of the influence of education on labour market outcomes and offers practical advice for students facing a trade-off between university and major reputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinghao Li & Jian Zhou & Yang Cai, 2025. "The return of university reputation in job applications: evidence from a field experiment in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(47), pages 7627-7642, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:47:p:7627-7642
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2393458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2393458
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2393458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:47:p:7627-7642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.