IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i44p7011-7024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peers in puppy love and student academic performance in middle school: quasi-experimental evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Boou Chen
  • Wen Xu
  • Jinhua Zhang

Abstract

In the ongoing debate regarding the impact of puppy love on adolescents’ personal development, the existing literature has paid insufficient attention to the externalities of students experiencing puppy love in classrooms. By using a nationally representative survey of middle school students in China, we employed random student-classroom assignment as a quasi-experiment to investigate the causal effect of classroom peers experiencing puppy love on students’ academic performance. We found that classroom peers in puppy love had an adverse impact on students’ academic performance, which is proven to be reliable by a series of robustness checks, including instrumental variable(IV)estimation, removing extreme observations, placebo tests, and adding other control variables. Mechanism analysis indicated that this negative peer effect was caused by students’ lower learning effort, lower expectations for the future, further peer effect of student friends and teachers’ lack of responsibility and patience. Furthermore, this negative effect was more pronounced among boys, students with high family income, and medium or low cognitive ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Boou Chen & Wen Xu & Jinhua Zhang, 2025. "Peers in puppy love and student academic performance in middle school: quasi-experimental evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(44), pages 7011-7024, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:44:p:7011-7024
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2387373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2387373
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2387373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:44:p:7011-7024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.