IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i44p6979-6995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do major public emergencies affect audit quality? —Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Zhu
  • Liufang Xie

Abstract

Taking Chinese listed firms from 2019 to 2021 as research samples, we examine the impact of major public emergencies on audit quality using COVID-19 as exogenous shock. Distinguishing the location of audit clients and that of auditors, we find that if major public emergency occurs in the city of audit clients during the period of annual report audit, audit quality will be significantly reduced. If emergency occurs in auditor’s city, audit quality has improved instead of declining. Through the heterogeneity test, we find that the information level of audit clients has a double effect. When public emergencies in audit clients’ locality have a negative impact on audit quality, the information level of clients can alleviate the negative impact. However, when emergencies occur in auditor’s locality, the higher information level of the client may lower audit quality. However, whether public emergence occurs in the city of clients or auditors, auditing firms’ information technology level and more information technology personnel in auditors’ team are conducive to improve audit quality. The research has enriched the relevant research on audit quality in the context of public emergencies, and provided a theoretical basis for the urgency of digital transformation of accounting and auditing industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Zhu & Liufang Xie, 2025. "Do major public emergencies affect audit quality? —Evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(44), pages 6979-6995, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:44:p:6979-6995
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2387371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2387371
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2387371?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:44:p:6979-6995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.