IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i43p6869-6883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do employee-friendly practices affect inventory leanness?

Author

Listed:
  • Hamdi Ben-Nasr
  • Mohamed Goaied

Abstract

We examine the impact of employee-friendly practices (i.e. employment quality, training and development, and employee turnover) on inventory leanness. We use the Empirical Leanness Indicator (ELI) as a proxy for inventory leanness. We employ OLS estimates to estimate our regressions while controlling for country, industry, and year-fixed effects and clustering standard errors at the firm level. We use alternative approaches to address endogeneity issues, such as the instrumental variable and the Heckman two-stage approaches. Our results suggest that employee-friendly practices improve inventory leanness. Our findings suggest that firms should invest in employee-friendly practices. This policy implication is of paramount importance for firms with more employees working in roles involving inventory (as opposed to automation or non-labour methods) and in environments with high dynamism and complexity. We also suggest that reputation mediates the relationship between employee-friendly practices and inventory leanness.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamdi Ben-Nasr & Mohamed Goaied, 2025. "Do employee-friendly practices affect inventory leanness?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(43), pages 6869-6883, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:43:p:6869-6883
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2386861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2386861
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2386861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:43:p:6869-6883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.