IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i40p6318-6332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How government-run funds guide corporate ESG: evidence from social security fund holdings in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jinxuan Li
  • Hui Wang
  • Huiyu Wen
  • Bingyuan Xie

Abstract

This paper investigates how government-run funds guide environmental, social, and governance (ESG) engagement. Using a comprehensive dataset of fund holdings in 4,251 Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2020, we find that firms significantly improve ESG performance after entering social security fund portfolios. Mechanism analyses indicate that social security funds guide firms to incorporate ESG factors in corporate decisions by enhancing reputation risk management awareness and long-term funding accessibility. Furthermore, the positive effect on corporate ESG performance is more pronounced in cases of non-SOE portfolio firms and more active social security fund investments. The relationship is robust after addressing endogeneity issues with PSM and stacked DID methods. Our findings demonstrate another driving force of ESG and a guiding role of government-run funds in promoting sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinxuan Li & Hui Wang & Huiyu Wen & Bingyuan Xie, 2025. "How government-run funds guide corporate ESG: evidence from social security fund holdings in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(40), pages 6318-6332, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:40:p:6318-6332
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2383332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2383332
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2383332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:40:p:6318-6332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.