IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i38p5910-5923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation risk and the quality of key audit matters: an analysis based on the auditor’s disclosing motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Yidi Fu
  • Xianpei Lv
  • Tianjiao Zheng

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of regulatory risk on the quality of key audit matters (KAMs) through the lens of the auditors’ motivations. Employing STATA to conduct regression analysis on data encompassing 22,075 firm-year observations from Chinese A-share listed companies over the period from 2017 to 2022, we find that auditors with higher regulation risk disclose more KAMs, especially the differentiated KAMs, and provide more details through longer text content. This behaviour is driven by the desire to signal client risks and mitigate audit liability. Additional analysis indicates that the heightened regulatory risk makes auditors more sensitive to the risks related to non-accounting areas, which are less auditable. Meanwhile, audit clients may hinder auditors from disclosing more information in KAMs to avoid additional costs. Finally we also reveal that the regulatory risk enhances the quality of KAMs disclosed by non-Big 4 auditors. Our study sheds light on the motivations behind auditors’ disclosure motivations while informing regulators and investors to pay closer attention to the quality of KAMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yidi Fu & Xianpei Lv & Tianjiao Zheng, 2025. "Regulation risk and the quality of key audit matters: an analysis based on the auditor’s disclosing motivation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(38), pages 5910-5923, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:38:p:5910-5923
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2372479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2372479
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2372479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:38:p:5910-5923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.