IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i36p5444-5459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological progress and labour welfare: evidence from robot adoption in China

Author

Listed:
  • Kouming Liu
  • Xiaobin Guo
  • Aiyun Nie
  • Chante Jian Ding

Abstract

The widespread integration of robots has raised apprehensions about their influence on labourlabour welfare. Utilizing data from the China Labor-force Dynamic Survey (CLDS) spanning 2014 to 2018 and robot data from the International Federation of Robotics (IFR), we explore the influence of robots on workers’ health and the associated mechanisms. Contrary to prevalent societal concerns, our study reveals that the utilization of robots substantially enhances worker health. Mechanistic tests demonstrate the effectiveness of robots in enhancing worker health through task reallocation and improvements to the work environment. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the advantages of robot utilization may particularly benefit vulnerable groups, including those with physically demanding jobs, low-skilled workers, and migrant populations. This fosters the gradual development of a “human-machine symbiosis” in the interaction between machines and humans. Subsequent research has demonstrated that the implementation of robots is effective in diminishing work intensity and alleviating negative anxiety among workers, thereby enhancing their mental health. By drawing evidence from developing countries to illuminate the positive aspects of the forces of creative destruction, our study offers a micro-perspective for objectively evaluating intelligent applications and worker welfare. It also provides instructive insights for a comprehensive assessment of the robot-human relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Kouming Liu & Xiaobin Guo & Aiyun Nie & Chante Jian Ding, 2025. "Technological progress and labour welfare: evidence from robot adoption in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(36), pages 5444-5459, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:36:p:5444-5459
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2364929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364929
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:36:p:5444-5459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.