IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i35p5249-5265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of local government bonds on land-leasing behaviours and the economic consequences: evidence from the self-issuance reforms in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Tan
  • Qinying Xu
  • Hao Xu
  • Guanglu Zhang

Abstract

Under the 1995 Budget Law, land finance, rather than local government bonds (LGBs), played a critical role in bridging fiscal gaps for Chinese local governments. This paper examines the impact of the self-issuance (SI) reform of LGBs from 2011 on land leasing using county-level data from 2000 to 2019 combined with land parcel data and business registration databases of China. Findings reveal that, firstly, SI reforms initially reduce land leasing but increase it by 24.86% three years later, with a preference for commercial and residential land. Reforms also raise commercial and residential land leasing prices by 14.22% and do not compel lower prices for industrial land. Secondly, based on repayment obligations, the self-issuance and central-government-repayment (SICGR) mode alleviates fiscal pressure, favouring commercial and residential land leasing, while the self-issuance and self-repayment (SISR) pattern enhances fiscal sustainability and leads to more industrial land leasing. Thirdly, mechanism analysis suggests that SI reforms increase debt burden and decrease fiscal self-sufficiency, primarily through land tender, auction, and listing mechanisms, resulting in unbalanced regional development. This research highlights the need for sustainable development patterns under the New Budget Law of 2015, balancing fiscal revenues, the land market, and local government debts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Tan & Qinying Xu & Hao Xu & Guanglu Zhang, 2025. "The impact of local government bonds on land-leasing behaviours and the economic consequences: evidence from the self-issuance reforms in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(35), pages 5249-5265, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:35:p:5249-5265
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2364917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364917
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:35:p:5249-5265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.