IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i33p4955-4972.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unintended effect of reduced patient cost sharing: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Xiao
  • Gordon G. Liu

Abstract

In China, hospitals are classified into three tiers based on size and quality to triage patients. Among them, tier-2 and tier-3 hospitals provide similar inpatient services, while tier-3s have higher patient cost sharing due to their ability to provide more sophisticated care. In this study, we exploit a plausibly exogenous change in the financial environment facing tier-2 hospitals: reduced cost sharing in tier-3s. We find that patients are diverted from tier-2s after the reform, and in response to income loss, tier-2s increase the surgical probability and total expense per admission. A 1% decrease in the number of admissions increases the surgical probability by 0.25%, which suggests supplier-induced demand. We also find that tier-2 hospitals induce greater demand from patients with less urgent conditions and more elective procedures. Our analysis suggests that benevolent cost sharing reduction may have unintended consequences beyond the targeted group, and policymakers who neglect these effects would underestimate the costs of such reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Xiao & Gordon G. Liu, 2025. "Unintended effect of reduced patient cost sharing: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(33), pages 4955-4972, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:33:p:4955-4972
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2364107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2364107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:33:p:4955-4972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.