IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i20p2477-2494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political costs and investors’ site visits: evidence from the section 301 investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Wang
  • Yue Sun

Abstract

We explore the relationship between political costs and investors’ site visits. We find that the Section 301 investigation launched by the United States government in 2017 increased Chinese high-tech companies’ resistance to site visits. This effect was more pronounced for companies receiving government subsidies and companies with political connections. We further find that high-tech companies underwent fewer site visits with independent institutions (i.e. securities firms, fund companies) but more site visits with security underwriters (non-independent institutions), depending on different investors’ ability to disseminate corporate information. Moreover, high-tech firms selectively avoided certain topics from discussion during site visits. Additionally, the corporate shareholder structure also changed with the adjustments of visiting investors. High-tech companies reduced their site visits to avoid negative economic consequences. Overall, our study provides evidence that political costs influence the information communication behaviour of companies in the country being investigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Wang & Yue Sun, 2025. "Political costs and investors’ site visits: evidence from the section 301 investigation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(20), pages 2477-2494, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:20:p:2477-2494
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2325376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2325376
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2325376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:20:p:2477-2494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.