IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i19p2441-2458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do auditors value social trust? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Kun Su
  • Hedy Jiaying Huang

Abstract

Using a sample of Chinese listed companies between 2007 and 2021, we investigate the association between social trust and audit outcomes. Results suggest that regional level of social trust can improve audit efficiency and reduce audit fees. We further find client firms reside in high-trust regions are less likely to engage with Big10 auditors in China. Both audit efficiency and auditor choice play partial mediating roles in lowering audit fees. The negative effect of social trust on audit fees is more pronounced in firms located in strong legal enforcement region, with state ownership, or in firms audited by non-Big10 auditors. By documenting the reduced audit fees and the lower likelihood of hiring Big10 auditors do not lead to deterioration in audit quality, our study has important social and policy implications for strengthening informal norms in regions with low social trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Kun Su & Hedy Jiaying Huang, 2025. "Do auditors value social trust? Evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(19), pages 2441-2458, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:19:p:2441-2458
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2325374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2325374
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2325374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:19:p:2441-2458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.