IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i18p2267-2280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple large shareholders and M&A quality: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohong Yu
  • Bo Lyu
  • Jingjing Li
  • Ming Xu

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of the presence of multiple large shareholders (MLS) on the quality of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Using data from the Chinese market, we find that the presence of MLS in acquiring firms is associated with a higher level of goodwill impairment in the three-year period following the completion of an M&A transaction, relative to firms devoid of such shareholder structures. The further analysis suggests that the identity of these shareholders is crucial; specifically, when the second-largest shareholder is identical to the controlling shareholder, the adverse effects on goodwill valuation are more significant. This relationship is mitigated when the identities of the controlling and the second-largest shareholders differ. The impact is particularly noticeable in transactions involving commitment performance contracts, related party transactions, and in sectors characterized by high goodwill valuations. This study contributes to the literature on the economic outcomes associated with MLS structures in China, a context marked by the prevalence of such ownership arrangements and limited minority shareholder protections.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohong Yu & Bo Lyu & Jingjing Li & Ming Xu, 2025. "Multiple large shareholders and M&A quality: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(18), pages 2267-2280, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:18:p:2267-2280
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2323022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2323022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2323022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:18:p:2267-2280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.