IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v57y2025i18p2161-2174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can audit committees’ environmental background promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiafeng Gong
  • Jianing Song
  • Jia Zhou

Abstract

Identifying potential driving factors for corporate green innovation is vital in promoting global green development. This study aims to examine whether the environmental background of the audit committee promotes corporate green innovation and the mechanisms involved. Based on this perspective, we empirically test a research sample of Chinese A-share market-listed companies from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal that, first, the audit committee’s environmental background can significantly promote green corporate innovation. Second, the audit committee promotes green innovation by enhancing the environmental awareness of the management, increasing substantial environmental investments, and fostering environmental compliance; this effect is more pronounced in companies characterized by significant media attention and considerable involvement of the audit committee in governance. Third, green innovation can significantly enhance economic and environmental performance, although it delays its impact on short-term economic performance. The conclusions of this study provide new empirical evidence for corporate governance optimization and green innovation, and offer decision-making insights for enterprises to implement green innovation strategies for sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiafeng Gong & Jianing Song & Jia Zhou, 2025. "Can audit committees’ environmental background promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(18), pages 2161-2174, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:18:p:2161-2174
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2024.2425115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2024.2425115
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2024.2425115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:57:y:2025:i:18:p:2161-2174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.