IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i17p1877-1890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Underwriter ratings and risk-taking of IPO firms: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Linlang Zhang
  • Han Zhang
  • Xiongyuan Wang

Abstract

Unlike the existing literature, which focuses on the underwriter reputation, this paper examines the effect of underwriters on the risks of IPO (initial public offering) firms from the perspective of the ability to control risks. Using the underwriter rating by CSRC (China Securities Regulatory Commission), we find that the underwriter rating provides incremental information over the underwriter reputation and mainly reflects the ability of the underwriter to control risks. Consistent with this hypothesis, we document a negative relationship between the underwriter rating and the earnings volatility of firms after an IPO. Our results remain qualitatively similar after a series of robustness tests. Additional analysis suggests that an underwriter with a higher ability to control risks, proxied by the risk index of the underwriter, can significantly lower firms’ risks. Moreover, we find that a highly rated underwriter can reduce stock return volatility, discretionary accruals, the potential for a decline in earnings, and penalties by the CSRC. This study enriches the literature on how underwriter plays an essential role in IPOs from the ability to control risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Linlang Zhang & Han Zhang & Xiongyuan Wang, 2023. "Underwriter ratings and risk-taking of IPO firms: evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(17), pages 1877-1890, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:17:p:1877-1890
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2099805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2099805
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2099805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:17:p:1877-1890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.