IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i16p1790-1806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Cultural Heterogeneity on Violence in Indonesia: Fractionalisation versus polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ryan Sanjaya
  • Swee Hoon Chuah
  • Simon Feeny
  • Robert Hoffmann

Abstract

The determinants of large-scale conflict have been examined extensively in the academic literature. The factors contributing to everyday violence have received less attention despite this smaller-scale conflict having a high human and economic cost. We analyse a dataset at the level of 495 Indonesian districts to estimate the determinants of non-domestic, small-scale violence prevalent in this nation. We focus on the role of pronounced cultural heterogeneity that characterizes Indonesia and contribute to the literature by empirically testing whether established conflict theory holds for smaller scale violence data in the case of Indonesia. Ethnic polarization (rather than fractionalization) is the main driver of conflict intensity, suggesting that district-level conflicts are commonly over public goods. Cultural heterogeneity has a curvilinear effect on conflict. It increases the intensity of violence up to a point, after which the level decreases. Overall, our results offer some support for the Esteban and Ray model of conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ryan Sanjaya & Swee Hoon Chuah & Simon Feeny & Robert Hoffmann, 2023. "The Impact of Cultural Heterogeneity on Violence in Indonesia: Fractionalisation versus polarization," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 1790-1806, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:16:p:1790-1806
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2099800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2099800
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2099800?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:16:p:1790-1806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.