IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v54y2022i55p6393-6405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The sample median as an estimator of population mean true willingness to pay under valuation uncertainty: a synthesis and analysis of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Mattias Boman

Abstract

This paper reviews the contingent valuation literature on hypothetical bias and valuation uncertainty, with special emphasis on measures of central tendency suitable for applied welfare analysis. In a theoretical scenario without valuation uncertainty, sample mean willingness to pay (WTP) is an estimator of population mean true WTP, the appropriate welfare measure. It is proposed here that this may not hold under valuation uncertainty. In this case, mean true WTP should be bounded by mean hypothetical WTP and mean actual WTP (in turn, mean actual WTP should exceed mean certain WTP). Based on a theoretical model and a review of existing empirical studies, median hypothetical WTP was found to be an estimator of mean true WTP. It is therefore proposed that contingent valuation researchers should consider using the sample hypothetical median as an estimator of population mean true WTP when supporting data on the degree of valuation uncertainty are absent. This could be a straightforward approach, e.g. in a low income country context, where the possibility of financing elaborate research designs accounting for valuation uncertainty is limited. It can also prove useful to revisit existing contingent valuation studies with these findings in mind.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattias Boman, 2022. "The sample median as an estimator of population mean true willingness to pay under valuation uncertainty: a synthesis and analysis of the literature," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(55), pages 6393-6405, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:55:p:6393-6405
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2064419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2064419
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2064419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:55:p:6393-6405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.