IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v54y2022i21p2453-2472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of delayed school entry on child learning in rural northwestern China — forced delay versus voluntary delay

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Qihui

Abstract

Most previous studies exploit the discontinuity in children’s school entry age around the enrolment cut-off to identify the effect of delayed school entry on child learning. However, the effect so identified is only relevant to children who were ‘forced’ to enter school late because of being born slightly after the enrolment cut-off. In developing countries, many children voluntarily start school late regardless of their birthdates, for whom the commonly-used discontinuity-based strategy fails to identify the effect relevant to their delayed enrolment. This study exploits community peer effects to estimate the impact of voluntary delay in school entry, using older peers’ school entry age to instrument one’s own school entry age. Analysing data on nearly 4,000 children from rural northwestern China, we found that while both types of delay in school entry raise the incidence of first-grade repetition, the effect of voluntary delay is much larger than that of forced delay. More specifically, one year of voluntary delay increases a child’s likelihood of first-grade retention by 12.4 percentage points, which is more than twice the effect of forced delay.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Qihui, 2022. "Impacts of delayed school entry on child learning in rural northwestern China — forced delay versus voluntary delay," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 2453-2472, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:21:p:2453-2472
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1990845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2021.1990845
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2021.1990845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:21:p:2453-2472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.