IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v53y2021i36p4229-4244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding trustworthy common ground: analysis of Chinese trust in Americans (2012–2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Yu
  • Xiangbin Cheng
  • Kuo Zhang
  • Jipeng Pei
  • Karlis Rokpelnis

Abstract

Using four waves of CFPS data from 2012 to 2018, we focused on the degree of Chinese individuals’ trust in Americans, and found that the Chinese interviewees were ‘very distrustful’ Americans. We employed the random-effects ordered probit method to estimate the model, and made the following key conclusions: in terms of individual characteristics, (1) gender factors affect Chinese trust in Americans, the degree of trust among males is higher than that among females; (2) the Chinese individuals’ trust in Americans gradually decreases with the advance of age; (3) the level of education has a positive correlation with international trust. Meanwhile, socioeconomic factors play an important role in explaining the degree of Chinese individuals’ trust in Americans. Chinese individuals with higher social status and relative income are more likely to trust Americans. Moreover, the attitude and evaluation of individuals towards the government are also worthy of attention. Importantly, in contrast to earlier published findings, we found that Chinese Communist Party members were more likely to trust Americans, while military veterans, however, have a low degree of trust in American people, which might be highly correlated with the China–US political relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Yu & Xiangbin Cheng & Kuo Zhang & Jipeng Pei & Karlis Rokpelnis, 2021. "Finding trustworthy common ground: analysis of Chinese trust in Americans (2012–2018)," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(36), pages 4229-4244, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:53:y:2021:i:36:p:4229-4244
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2021.1897735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2021.1897735
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2021.1897735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:53:y:2021:i:36:p:4229-4244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.