IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v49y2017i12p1194-1203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LM cointegration tests allowing for an unknown number of breaks: implications for the forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-Yop Oh
  • Hyejin Lee

Abstract

This article extends the Lagrange multiplier (LM) cointegration test proposed by Westerlund and Edgerton (WE 2007) by allowing for an unknown number of breaks. Monte Carlo simulations provide two main results. First, a loss of power in the LM cointegration tests is detected when potential multiple breaks are ignored. Second, the modified testing procedures do not affect the asymptotic distribution and major properties of the tests of WE under the null, but noticeably increase their testing power in presence of multiple breaks. We also provide empirical applications of the proposed tests for the forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis (FRUH). The results reveal that the FRUH does hold when the effects of the multiple structural breaks are taken into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-Yop Oh & Hyejin Lee, 2017. "LM cointegration tests allowing for an unknown number of breaks: implications for the forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(12), pages 1194-1203, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:49:y:2017:i:12:p:1194-1203
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2016.1213366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2016.1213366
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2016.1213366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:49:y:2017:i:12:p:1194-1203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.