IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v45y2013i25p3617-3624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does option provide more informative content than stock after regulation fair disclosure?

Author

Listed:
  • H. C. Huang
  • P. S. Tung

Abstract

This article examines the impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD), which intends to eliminate selective disclosure to only a few privileged interested parties, on the information embedded in the stock-and-option markets prior to tender offer announcements. In the pre-announcement period after Reg FD, the volume of public option information contains less information about subsequent stock price movements. Although the quantity of public information may be higher after Reg FD, the inferior quality of publicly available option information dominates the higher quantity. Thus, the predictive power of option information decreases. In the post-RFD pre-announcement period, the volume of public option information is more informative than the volume of stock private information. It indicates that although the quality of private stock information is superior to that of public option information, the much lower quantity of stock information results in a lower predictive power of private stock information than that of public option information.

Suggested Citation

  • H. C. Huang & P. S. Tung, 2013. "Does option provide more informative content than stock after regulation fair disclosure?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(25), pages 3617-3624, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:45:y:2013:i:25:p:3617-3624
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2012.725936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2012.725936
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2012.725936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:45:y:2013:i:25:p:3617-3624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.